Legal Opinion

Mirandona v. Aaxico Airlines, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1962No. 678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUTHER E. HALL, Judge pro tem.

Plaintiffs, wholesale fur merchants in the city of New Orleans, shipped four bales of muskrat furs to New York via defendant Airline. One bale of fur was rejected by the buyer in New York because the packing had been damaged. According to the uncontradicted testimony of plaintiffs, the defendant Airline’s New Orleans manager agreed that the furs would be returned to New Orleans to be repacked at the Airline’s cost and then returned to New York.

The bale of furs, its packing damaged but otherwise in good condition, was thereafter placed on one of defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leigh v. Johnson-Evans MotorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Dean v. PisciottaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  3. Wittenberg v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller Car Washes, Inc. v. CroweLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. HarbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Executive House Bldg., Inc. v. Optimum Systems Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API