Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Knippers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 2003No. 96,331Published

1Opinion of the Court

72 P.3d 17 (2003)

2003 OK 58

Holly Suzanne INGRAM, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

John Michael KNIPPERS, Defendant,

John C. Knippers, Third Party Defendant/Appellant.

No. 96,331.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 3, 2003.

Sharon L. Corbitt, Corbitt & Johnson, P.C., Brian S. Gaskill, Sneed Lang, P.C., Tulsa, OK, for the Appellant.

Mark A. Zannotti, Tulsa, OK, for the Appellee.

HODGES, J.

¶ 1 The issues before this Court are: (1) whether the district court erred in refusing grandparent's request to enforce a consent visitation order, (2) whether the district erred in treating mother's motion to terminate visitation…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API