Syracuse Chilled Plow Co. v. . Wing
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 10, 1880, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Read the full summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 10, 1880, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. (Reported below, 20 Hun, 206.) ■ This action was brought by plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of defendant George E. Wing, to ■ set aside a conveyance of a farm in Dutchess county, from said defendant, through a third person, to his wife, the defendant Caroline Wing. The court found these facts among others: “ On the 1st day of May, 1844,…
1Opinion of the CourtRapallo, J.
The point upon which the appellant relies is that at the time of the receipt by George E. Wing from the guardian of his wife, of the $1,366 which she inherited from her father, he gave no obligation to settle the fund upon his wife or secure if to her. That it became his property, by virtue of his marital right (he having received it before the married woman act of 1848) and consequently the mortgage which thirtj-three years afterward he gave to her' for that money, and the interest thereon, had no consideration, legal or equitable, to support it, but was void as against his creditors.
The…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Billings v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Smith v. Farmers & Merchants Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Perea v. Colorado National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1891
- Ellis v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Sweetser v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.