Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1932No. 558PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying an application for leave to file a tendered supplemental bill directed at a decree rendered herein in April, 1927. That decree was based on a contract by which appellant agreed to purchase a one-half interest in an Osage oil lease for $50,000, if the Secretary of the Interior approved assignments of the half interest to it. The assignments and the $50,000 were in the possession of the clerk of the court. The decree enjoined upon appellant the duty of co-operating with appellee in securing the approval of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Ted W. Brown, Secretary of State v. James I. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API