Hill v. Rhule
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action for conversion of horses. Judgment for defendants. Error to the District Court of Lincoln County, Hon. Arthur Comforth, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
delivéred the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff below, Dell Hill, brought this action against F. J. Rhule and others for damages for conversion of fourteen head of horses. The defendants for their affirmative defense alleged that the stock “is in the possession of one of the defendants, to-wit. F. J. Rhule,” and that his right to possession is founded upon an agister’s lien. Trial was to a jury. Plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict was denied.. Verdict was for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.
Some questions are raised by defendants in error regarding the sufficiency of the record and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Auld v. TravisColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
- Crismon v. Barse Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Ellison v. TuckermanColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ellison v. TuckermanColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Rohrer v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ahlswede v. SchoneveldNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- La Junta Production Credit Ass'n v. SchroderColorado Court of Appeals · 1990