Korander v. Penn Bridge Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. E. O’Keefe, E. L. Thomas, and C. N. Andrews, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant moved for a nonsuit, which motion the court granted. Judgment went accordingly, from which plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
The complaint contains two counts, the cause of action in one of which (and the only one necessary to here consider) is based upon the alleged negligence of an engineer engaged in operating a steam hoisting engine supplying motive power in operating a pile-driver upon which plaintiff was employed. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Mann v. O'SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Livingston v. Kodiak Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Bridges v. Los Angeles Pacific Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Stephens v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911