Legal Opinion · Dissent

Talbot v. Jansen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 16, 1988No. 87-20Published

1Dissent

Robert Edwards, Special Chief Justice,

dissenting. The doctrine of res judicata provides that a prior decree bars a subsequent suit when the subsequent cause involves the same subject matter as that determined in the former suit between the same parties, and the bar extends to those questions of law and fact which might have been but were not presented. Turner v. State, 248 Ark. 367, 452 S.W.2d 317 (1970); Martin v. Citizen’s Bank of Beebe, 283 Ark. 145, 671 S.W.2d 754 (1984). Exactly the same parties are not required in order to render issues adjudicated in a former suit res judicata, since…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crossett Health Center v. CroswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Dunlap v. McCartySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Wells v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Southern Farmers Assn., Inc. v. WyattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Jefferson v. NeroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API