Legal Opinion · Dissent

James Warmington v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 16, 2014No. SC12-1050Published

1DissentPolston, J.

I agree with Justice Perry’s dissent that this Court does not have jurisdiction in this case. As Justice Perry states, the Third District’s decision in Warmington v. State, 86 So.3d 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), does not expressly and directly conflict with this Court’s decision in Hayes v. State, 660 So.2d 257 (Fla.1995), the Fourth District’s decision in Ramirez v. State, 1 So.3d 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), or the *657Second District’s decision in Miele v. State, 875 So.2d 812 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

In Hayes, Ramirez, and Miele, the prosecutors commented on the defendants’ failure to produce exculpatory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Miele v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Warmington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API