Shannon v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Charged by information with soliciting for lewd and immoral purposes, 1 appellant was, after trial without a jury, 2 found guilty and sentenced to ninety days imprisonment — the maximum term provided by law. On this appeal he contends that (1) the statute is unconstitutionally vague, (2) the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the grounds of entrapment and the government’s failure to establish the elements of the offense, and (3) he was denied a fair and impartial trial. The latter contention is one neither to be made lightly nor to be treated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MarzanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Whitaker v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Harvin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Shannon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.