Thain v. Old Colony Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The plaintiff, an engineer employed oy the defendant, was injured while on duty by being carried against a wooden post standing four feet from the track and two feet from the tender beam, where the plaintiff was at the time. The post had been put up as a temporary support to Hogg Bridge, Roxbury, about a week before, and the plaintiff testified that he did not know of it. The question is whether the judge was right in taking the case from the jury.
It is necessary for railroad companies to put up structures near enough to their tracks for it to be possible for persons on the trains to come in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Tuttle v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Geo. Pacific Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Lovejoy v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Ferren v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Goodes v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Kenney v. Hingham Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Content v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Bell v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Omaha Bottling Co. v. TheilerNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.