Roberts v. Cason

The reason that Judge Harris, as stated in his special concurrence, cannot discern “whether the arrow sliot into the air in Orange County landed in Orange or Lake County” is because it did not land {i.e., accrue) any place at all based upon the plaintiffs’ amended complaint, which is woefully inadequate. The amended complaint alleges in conclusionary terms that Attorney Roberts negligently represented the plaintiffs at a real estate closing and in post-closing transactions in Orange and Lake Counties in regard to land they owned in Lake County and “failed to protect their financial interests”…