Legal Opinion

Ammons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 1992No. 92-980Published

1Per curiam

Ralph B. Ammons has appealed an habitual offender sentence imposed after he pled nolo contendere in several cases. The habitual offender statute requires that certain findings be made before the enhanced penalties afforded by that statute may be applied. Section 775.084(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla.1985); Knickerbocker v. State, 604 So.2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Rome v. State, 603 So.2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Because the trial court herein failed to make the required findings, Ammons’ sentence is reversed, and the case is remanded for resentencing.

JOANOS,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Knickerbocker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Rome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API