State v. Woodcock
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*661YOUNG, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for furnishing obscene materials to minors, a Class A misdemeanor. ORS 167.065(2). He argues on appeal that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer, because ORS 167.065(1)(b) is unconstitutionally overbroad under Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution.1 We agree and reverse.2
Defendant sold lapel buttons containing slogans not fit for print in these pages.3 He was convicted of furnishing material containing obscenities to minors in violation of ORS 167.065(1)(b), which provides in part:
“(1) A person commits the crime of furnishing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FrinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Marriage of StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- In Re the Marriage of DuckettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- In re the Marriage of WittkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- In re the Marriage of FrancoisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.