Legal Opinion

United States v. Lizarraga-Carrizales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2014No. 10-50148PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Roberto Ivan Li-zarraga-Carrizales (“Lizarraga”) appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 (the “federal offense”). Lizarraga claims that the district court improperly engaged in judicial fact-finding in denying him safety valve relief from the mandatory minimum sentence and misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that the safety valve determination under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) does not implicate Alleyne v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. James KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. United States v. Claudius FincherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Michael VoelzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Juan LeanosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API