Legal Opinion

United States v. Scholz

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 29, 1995No. CR-N-94-0075-ECRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.

The court now rules on Defendant David Scholz’ Motion to Supplement Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. # 363). Defendant argues (1) that the federal prosecution on narcotics charges violates his constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy for the same offense, and (2) that the United States breached its agreement not to prosecute him in exchange for information. This court has previously ruled from the bench that Mr. Scholz had not sustained the burden of proving the existence of such an agreement (Hearing on Defendant’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API