Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Beazer Homes Investments, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 8, 2010No. 08-5967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On February 4, 2010, this court filed an opinion affirming the judgment below. See Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Beazer Homes Investments, LLC, 594 F.3d 441 (6th Cir.2010). That opinion held that “unless and until the Indiana Supreme Court decides otherwise,” a standard commercial general liability (CGL) insurance contract does not provide coverage to the insured general contractor for water damage to the project in question caused by the faulty workmanship of the subcontractors. Id. at 451. At the time of our decision, however, the case of Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Cincinnati Insurance v. Beazer Homes Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pulte Home Corp. v. TIG Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
  2. Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API