Legal Opinion

Kramb v. Fincher

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Since the reversal by the Appellate Division of the judgment in favor of plaintiff on the third cause of action was upon the law and the facts and the complaint was dismissed on the ground that the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence in the case, a new trial must be ordered. (Imbrey v. Prudential Ins. Co., 286 N. Y. 434, 441; Toone v. City of New York, 218 N. Y. 616.)

The judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as it affirms the judgment of the trial court as to the second cause of action, should be affirmed, with costs.

The judgment of the Appellate Division,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Imbrey v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Toone v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stern v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API