Peterson v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
The only issue to be resolved in this case is stated in the Brief of Appellant as follows:
“Whether the District Judge’s refusal to reduce Appellant’s sentence was an abuse of his discretion.”
The district court denied the appellant’s pro se Motion for Sentence Reduction. The appellant originally had been sentenced to a term of not less than two nor more than five years on each of two counts of third-degree sexual assault of which he had been convicted upon his pleas of guilty. The court provided that the sentences would run consecutively. We conclude that there was no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Key v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Montez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Luke Hamilton JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Edward Farish Cumbie, and Willard CumbieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Price v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Mower v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Parker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Nelson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Peper v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.