Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1910No. Calendar No. 24,299Published

Case by William Hartley against Frank P. Miller for negligence. On motion by defendant and appellee to dismiss a case-made.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. Several reasons are assigned but the important one is that the appeal was perfected too late.

The attorney for the appellee in this motion did not represent the appellees in the court below. The record shows the judgment in the circuit court was entered October 13, 1909. At that term an order was entered giving appellant 60 days in which to settle a bill of exceptions or make a case. A motion was made for a new trial, which motion was overruled November 29, 1909. Within 60 days of this date the attorneys for the appellant prepared and served upon the'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ætna Live Stock Fire & Tornado Insurance v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Riley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People ex rel. Faust v. Judge of the Calhoun Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. VanBlarcom v. Ætna InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  5. People ex rel. Hunt v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API