Legal Opinion

McLaren v. Hutchinson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Tenth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

George H. Beach was indebted to the plaintiff and several other persons for work and labor done on the “ New England Farm.” Beach sold the farm and other property thereon to the defendant, and as a part of the price the defendant agreed in writing with Beach to pay the plaintiff and the other laborers the debts due to them. Immediately after, the plaintiff and the other laborers agreed with defendant to release Beach from the debts, and to look to him alone for their payment. The other laborers assigned their claims to the plaintiff, and he brought this action to enforce the contract. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farley v. ClevelandNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  2. McLaren v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Silver Bow Abstract Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Perry & Walden v. GallagherAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Casey v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API