Legal Opinion

Hoisington v. Kulchin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 3, 1965No. 33609PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioners, the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court, seek review by certiorari of a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reading as follows:

“PER CURIAM.
“Affirmed on the authority of City of Miami v. Saunders, 151 Fla. 699, 10 So.2d 326; City of Miami v. Fuller, Fla.1951, 54 So.2d 198; Henley v. Carter, Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 192, 44 A.L.R.2d 1339; Loftin v. Bryan, Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 310; Herring v. Eiland, Fla.1955, 81 So.2d 645; Dye v. Freeman, Fla.App.1959, 116 So.2d 647.”,

which is reported in 164 So.2d 833, affirming a summary final judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carraway v. RevellSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Farrey v. BettendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Bridges v. SpeerSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Cormier v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. KulchinSupreme Court of Florida · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API