Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Schultz-Costlow Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The nature of the action and the substance of the allegations of the complaint are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice McAvoy. Assuming the action is not within the principle of our memorandum decision in Carton v. Rubel Corp. (228 App. Div. 689), we are of opinion that the complaint shows a contractual obligation to redeem. It is. alleged that the defendant has refused not only to declare dividends, but also to comply with a request that the stock “ be redeemed in accordance with the terms of the certificate of stock.” It must be assumed from this allegation that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carton v. Rubel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strassburger v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Lakeman Realty Corp. v. Sunny Isles Ocean Beach Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API