Lindsay v. Atkin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
The question on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion to correct its earlier order “nunc pro tunc.” The order dismissed Parrish Oil Tools, Inc. (“Parrish Oil Tools”), defendant, from the lawsuit “with prejudice,” and defendant sought a change to reflect a dismissal “without prejudice.” We affirm the trial court’s order.
Plaintiff Lindsay sued appellants Atkin and Nyberg in May 1978 in Duchesne County District Court on a promissory note executed by appellants naming Southern Utah Hay Company (“Southern Utah Hay”) as promisor and Lindsay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,670 John Bershad v. Bernard P. McDonough and Cudahy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Richards v. SiddowayUtah Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bishop v. GenTec Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. RodriguesUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- DeVaney v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. DeVaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Thomas A. Paulsen Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MoyaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.