Legal Opinion

Sargent Co. Employees Fed. v. McElveen

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 8, 1949No. File No. 40323PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

To the plaintiff's claim based on a promissory note, the named defendant has asserted a defense of infancy, contending that he was born on July 22, 1927; that he executed and delivered the note on May 21, 1947, when he was under the age of twenty-one years; and that all payments on the note up to September 5, 1947, were made at a time when he was under the age of twenty-one. This action was instituted by service completed on October 20, 1948.

The plaintiff's demurrer is predicated on the fact that nowhere in the special defense is it alleged by the defendant that he disaffirmed the contract or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Hinton Foundry, Machine & Plumbing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wilcox v. RoathSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
  3. Tyler v. Estate of GallopMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Merchants' Credit Bureau v. AkiyamaUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Olson v. VeumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Economic Development Assoc. v. Cititrust, No. 052665 (Mar. 27, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API