Legal Opinion
Clancy v. Consolidated Freightways
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1982No. Civ.No. 62808PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
Plaintiffs Patrick E. Clancy and William Barber, dba BCW Enterprises, Inc., and David Fleischer, dba California Imports, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as plaintiffs) appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Consolidated Freightways, (hereinafter referred to as Consolidated).
Facts
The record discloses the following undisputed facts:
During the summer of 1976, Clancy and Barber, who manufacture burl tables in California, contracted to ship a number of tables to Fleischer in the State of New York. On August 18, 1976, they tendered the shipment of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- B. A. Walterman Company, an Ohio Corporation v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Bauer v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Muelder v. Western Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pacific Lightnet, Inc. v. Time Warner Telecom, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013