Larkin v. State

This is the second appearance of this case, arising out of the defendant’s sentencing. On the first occasion, we affirmed the judgment and sentence but reversed the retention of jurisdiction over the first one-third of the sentence and remanded with direction so that defendant could be apprised of the reasons for retention prior to pronouncement of sentence. Larkin v. State, 474 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

The defendant now contends each of the five reasons given for retention were legally insufficient; and if any one of the five was such, the retention must be vacated. We are convinced…