Luce v. Holloway
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff and respondent was a locomotive engineer employed by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company. While his engine was temporarily in charge of the trainmaster, hut while Luce was on board, the locomotive was derailed on one of the streets of the city of Pasadena by some earth that had been piled on the track by workmen engaged in grading the street. The accident caused serious injury to plaintiff and judgment in his favor was rendered against the appellant, who was the contractor to whom permission of the city council of Pasadena had been given to pave with asphalt the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Storrs v. . the City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Water Co. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Woodman v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Snyder v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Knell v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Snow v. Marian Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Wolsiffer v. BechillOregon Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.