Legal Opinion
Tebo v. Hazel
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided May 21, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
The motion for a preliminary injunction in this cause was argued Saturday, May 1st, by the solicitors for the respective parties on bill, answer, affidavits, and exhibits. Counsel asked for and obtained leave to file supplementary briefs on or before the following Saturday, and these have been duly presented, the brief of the respondents’ solicitors on Friday, May 7th, and the brief in reply of the complainants’ solicitors on Saturday, May 8th.
It appears from the bill and answer that William Saulsbury and William S. Haman, two of the complainants, are trustees of Wesley Church…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Audenried v. Philadelphia & Reading RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Richmond v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1892
- Andrews v. National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. DonahoeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1899
- Tanas v. Municipal Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- C & J Energy Services, Inc. v. City of Miami General Employees'Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Steiner v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Gray v. Council of Newark & the Newark Water & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
- Williamson v. McMonagleCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1912
- Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Consolidated Solubles Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.