Legal Opinion

Doe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 2003No. 2D01-4435Published

1Opinion of the Court

STRINGER, Judge.

John Doe a/k/a George Bailey (“Bailey”) seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his plea after sentencing. Bailey argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea because it was impossible for the court to adhere to the terms of his plea agreement. We agree and reverse.

The State charged Bailey with armed burglary with an assault, first-degree murder, five counts of aggravated assault, aggravated battery, attempted armed robbery, and shooting within a building. Bailey entered into a plea agreement in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Janney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API