Alabama Cash Credit Corporation v. Bartlett
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The common-law principle in respect to the recovery of usurious interest after the entire debt has been paid has been often referred to and followed in those states which have adopted the common-law rule that a contract to pay usurious interest is “illegal and void,” either in whole or in part. There was held to be in such a situation a kind of constructive duress conclusively presumed, and the ordinary rule that a voluntary payment cannot be recovered by the payer in the absence of fraud, mistake, or duress in fact was in that way made consistent, though there was no duress in fact. Gross v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCormick v. FallierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Jones v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Gross v. CoffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Cooledge v. CollumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Irby v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- First Nat. Bank of Opp v. BolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- The First National Bank of Birmingham v. W. E. DanielCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Harris v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Bell v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.