Legal Opinion

Swan & Finch Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 13, 1909No. 5,426PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, District Judge.

The article in controversy was invoiced as olein, but is shown by the testimony to be also known as wool olein or “wooleine.” It is described by the Board of General Appraisers as consisting of “a dark reddish oil distilled from wool grease.” By an admitted error it was classified as an acid. The board, without approving the collector’s assessment, held that it should have been classified as a distilled oil under Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule A, par. 3, 30 Stat. 151 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1627) and overruled the importers’ contention for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Movius v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  2. Zinkeisen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stone & Downer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API