Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. School District No. 18

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1943No. 8362Published

1Dissent

MR, JUSTICE MORRIS:

I dissent. The sole question for determination in this action is the interpretation of the written contract between the plaintiff and the school board. The majority decision converts the written contract of the parties into a scrap of paper and flies in the face of the elementary law of contracts. It is not debatable that a written contract supersedes all oral understandings and negotiations ; that the intention of the parties is to be ascertained from the writing alone, if possible (secs. 7529, 7530, Rev. Codes), unless through fraud, mistake or accident it fails to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Cruse v. FischlMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People Ex Rel. Callahan v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Frank v. Butte & Boulder Mining & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State Ex Rel. Normile v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1935

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API