Legal Opinion

Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Riggs

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1921No. 245-3440PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, J.

Plaintiff • in error, Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Company, operated the only telephone system in Houston. When a telephone was installed' it required the subscriber' to sign a written contract for a year, and pay two months’ rental in advance. Defendant in error, H. P. Riggs, signed such a contract for a. telephone in his residence and paid in advance the rental for two months from July 12, 1917. This contract was accepted by the company, and the telephone installed.

The company kept its accounts with its subscribers by numbers only, and through some mistake the money paid by Riggs was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Cumberland Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. HobartMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Sommerville v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
  5. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dallas Farm Machinery Co. v. ReavesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API