Legal Opinion

People v. Nance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the prosecutor provided acceptable race-neutral reasons for the exercise of her peremptory challenges against the prospective black jurors.

The court erred in admitting into evidence defendant’s notice of alibi (see, Williams v Florida, 399 US 78 [1970]). The error, however, was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

The remark of the police officer, after the witness Hulin selected defendant’s photograph from an array, was not likely to lead to a mistaken identification in view of Hulin’s unequivocal and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. NeeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DekenippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. RumphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  4. DEKENIPP, RICHARD A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. DekenippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API