Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Hazen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal' by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Crow "Wing county, Searle, J., presiding, (acting for the judge of the 15th •district,) sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an appeal from the disallowance by the probate court of a claim of $408.06, and interest, against the estate of Chauneey B. Sleeper, deceased, of whose last will the defendants are executors.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The plaintiffs filed in the probate court a claim against the estate of C. B. Sleeper, deceased, and from an order disallowing it they appealed to the district court. To the first cause of action (the second having been previously stricken out) set up in the •complaint, the defendants interposed a demurrer, and from an order sustaining the demurrer the plaintiffs appeal. The cause of action set up is predicated upon the alleged individual liability of Sleeper, as stockholder, for the debts of the Brainerd Driving Park Association, a corporation organized under Gen. St. 1878, c. 34, title 2.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. RahillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northwestern Trust Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. National New Haven Bank v. Northwestern Guaranty Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. In re Martin's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Achenbach v. Pomeroy Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API