Legal Opinion

Russell v. Tillotson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 24, 1885PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover for damage to his person, caused, while employed in the defendant’s mill, by his apron and jacket catching on a revolving shaft while he was standing on a ladder and replacing a board upon a belt box into which the shaft ran at right angles. The shaft was plainly visible, and was seen by the plaintiff. " If the ladder had been placed on the opposite side of the box, there would have been no danger. The plaintiff could have moved the ladder. But, according to his testimony, it was standing where he mounted it at the time when he was ordered by the “ boss ” to go…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leary v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Williams v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Gilbert v. Burlington, C. R. & N. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Rooney v. Sewall & Day Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Gowen v. HarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  5. Ciriack v. Merchants' Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API