Legal Opinion

Rincon Inv. Co. v. White

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 1935No. 9702PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellees have filed motion to strike the statement of facts from the record. The motion having been denied, appellees have moved for rehearing thereon.

The motion to strike is based upon two grounds: First, that appellees had no notice of the filing of the statement of facts in the court below, and therefore - had no opportunity to examine and make their objections thereto, before it was approved b> the trial judge and filed in this court; and, second, that certain documentary evidence adduced upon the trial was omitted from the statement of facts.

In the statute governing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Raymondville Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Garrison v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Rincon Inv. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Firquin v. MoneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKay v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Rudolph v. HanesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Johnson v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Patrick v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Stefka v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API