Legal Opinion
United States Casualty Co. v. Met Contracting Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtS. Samuel Di Falco, J.
This is a motion pursuant to section 799 of the Civil Practice Act to vacate so much of a third-party subpoena, served upon the City of New York by the judgment creditor herein, as stays the payment by the City of New York of certain funds to the moving parties.
The application results from the following state of facts: On or about December 10, 1953 the judgment debtor, hereinafter referred to as Met, entered into a written contract with the City of New York to do certain school construction work for the price of $675,000. Pursuant to the provisions of that agreement the moving parties (surety…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Triborough Bridge AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Corbin-Kellogg Agency, Inc. v. TaskerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Eisenberg v. HicksNew York Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz)New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz)New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Rason Asphalt, Inc. v. CravenNew York Supreme Court · 1959