Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rexburg Realty, Inc. v. Compton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1980No. 13085Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

I

The Court’s opinion contains a factually accurate portrayal of the underlying facts which gave rise to the fee dispute until the final paragraph wherein it is stated that “the agreement has been signed by two of the co-owners with representations made to the broker by the signing co-owners that the contemplated transaction would be approved by the third co-owner.” (Emphasis added.) No representations were made that can be found in my reading of the record. Nor do I find anything to substantiate the Court’s following statement which declares that the record supports the con*476elusion “that Dean…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tommerup v. Albertson's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Best v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bjornstad v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Anderson v. Idaho Mutual Benefit AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API