Legal Opinion
Bei Zhu v. Stephane Marchand
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 14, 2022No. 8:22-cv-00036Unknown
1Opinion
Case 8:22-cv-00036-JVS-DFM Document 8 Filed 01/14/22 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:23 1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BEI ZHU et al., CASE NUMBER: 10 11 SA CV 22-00036-JVS (DFMx) Plaintiff 12 v. 13 STEPHANIE MARCHAND et al., ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 14 STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 County of O r a n g e for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.