Rouse v. Paramount Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The question in this case is whether a dealer who sells *859to customers auto vehicle tires, tubes- and rim, and installs them gratis, is entitled to a lien on the vehicle for the price of the articles.
The question arose between intervening creditors in an action by Wallace T. Rouse against the Paramount Transit Company, in which a receiver was appointed for the transit company. The vehicle involved is a three and a half ton Dodge truck with six wheels. The C. I. T. Corporation claimed possession of the truck under a conditional sales contract…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bridgeport Machine Co. v. McKnabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Hockaday Auto Supply Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Clark v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Security Benefit Life Insurance v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- National Bond & Investment Co. v. Midwest Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Bryon Keith Street v. Robert NeuschmidDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023