Legal Opinion

Code v. Seattle Theatre Corporation

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1931No. 22906. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to restrain the defendants from using, assuming or adopting the name “Paramount”, and from changing the name of the “Seattle Theatre” to “Seattle Paramount Theatre,” and for damages. The cause was tried to the court, resulting in a judgment denying injunctive relief and dismissing the action, from which plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

In June, 1921, the appellant erected and opened his motion picture theatre at 2115 north Forty-fifth street, Seattle, Washington, and continuously thereafter operated under the trade name of “Paramount Theatre.” In 1926, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martell v. St. Francis Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Rosenburg v. Fremont Undertaking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Mitchel H. Mark Realty Corp. v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Groceteria Stores Co. v. TibbettWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Electric Supply Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Company and Continental Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Modular Cinemas of America, Inc. v. Mini Cinemas Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. Lininger v. Desert LodgeArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Direct Service Oil Co. v. HonzaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. H. Milgrim & Bros. v. SchlesingerOregon Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API