Nations v. Lassiter
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtQtjillian, J.
1. Where the defendant in a trover case makes a solemn admission in his pleadings that he is in possession of the chattel for the recovery of which the action is instituted, he will not be permitted to disprove such admission without first withdrawing it by appropriate amendment. Clift & Goodrich, Inc. v. Mincey Mfg. Co., 41 Ga. App. 38 (152 S. E. 136); Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Van Landingham, 44 Ga. App. 606 (162 S. E. 304). Where a fact alleged in the petition is admitted in the answer, it needs no proof. Moss v. Youngblood, 187 Ga. 188 (2) (200 S. E. 689). Where possession of an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Capital Automobile Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Clift & Goodrich Inc. v. Mincey Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Patterson Co. v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Moss v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Van LandinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re WinglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Stephens v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Rohatensky v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002