Legal Opinion

Nations v. Lassiter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1956No. 36362PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQtjillian, J.

1. Where the defendant in a trover case makes a solemn admission in his pleadings that he is in possession of the chattel for the recovery of which the action is instituted, he will not be permitted to disprove such admission without first withdrawing it by appropriate amendment. Clift & Goodrich, Inc. v. Mincey Mfg. Co., 41 Ga. App. 38 (152 S. E. 136); Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Van Landingham, 44 Ga. App. 606 (162 S. E. 304). Where a fact alleged in the petition is admitted in the answer, it needs no proof. Moss v. Youngblood, 187 Ga. 188 (2) (200 S. E. 689). Where possession of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Capital Automobile Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Clift & Goodrich Inc. v. Mincey Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Patterson Co. v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Moss v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Van LandinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WinglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Stephens v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Rohatensky v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API