Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bordan v. North Shore University Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 2000Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Santucci, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to modify the order by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the sixth cause of action to recover damages for tortious interference with contract, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion and otherwise affirming the order, with the following memorandum: I agree with my colleagues that tlie plaintiffs sixth cause of action for damages arising from tortious interference with contract should be reinstated. However, in my opinion, the complaint fails to state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bordell v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Rodgers v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Mandel v. Busch Entertainment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Hughes v. Gibson Courier Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Pail v. Precise Imports Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API