Polaroid Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition by Polaroid Corporation, hereinafter called taxpayer, to review a decision of the Tax Court holding that certain income received during the years 1951, 1952 and 1953 did not constitute “abnormal income” within the meaning of § 456(a) (2), Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 64 Stat. 1186 (1951), so as to qualify for the relief provided therein from the Korean War excess profits tax. 1 The taxpayer also contests a ruling that, in computing its net abnormal income for 1951 under § 456(a) (3) of the Int.Rev.Code of 1939, the interest with which it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Russell Motor Car Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Pedrick. Babcock & Wilcox Tube Co. v. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. JareckiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reid v. Gruntal & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1991
- John Geston v. Maggie D. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
- Amoco Oil Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.