Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1936No. 3990PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in the District Court obtained a judgment for $1,500 in a suit for damages suffered when he accidentally swallowed fragments of broken glass said to have been contained in a sealed can of condensed or evaporated milk bearing the label of the defendant company. A motion for a directed verdict was made by the defendant on the grounds that the evidence conclusively showed (1) that the goods were manufactured and packed under the best possible conditions and without negligence, and (2) that Swift & Co. was not the manufacturer of the goods, and had no privity of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Bourcheix v. Willow Brook Dairy, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Fleetwood v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Slavin v. Francis H. Leggett & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Campbell Soup Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dudley Sports Co. v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Alfonso Linwood Carney v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. O'DONNELL v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Jacob Blitzstein v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Sparks v. Oxy-Health, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API