Legal Opinion

Perdue v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 2009No. 2D07-5646PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRENSHAW, Judge.

John Thomas Perdue challenges the trial court’s imposition of a $525 fíne and surcharge and $20 Crime Stoppers Trust Fund cost in case CF07-0765, and another $525 fine and surcharge and $20 Crime Stoppers Trust Fund cost in case CF07-3377. Perdue properly preserved these issues by filing a motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). See Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 574 (Fla.2008) (“[T]he imposition of costs without statutory authority is a ‘sentencing error’ for purposes of rule 3.800(b).” (citing Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Dadds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Masengale v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. De la Fuente v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. CURAY DAVIS, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API