Legal Opinion

Boxwell v. Boxwell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1969No. 25099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES W. BROADDUS, Special Commissioner.

The parties hereto are Hubert Elmar Boxwell, appellant-plaintiff below, and Elvada Boxwell, respondent-defendant below, who were once husband and wife and, as such, jointly owned as tenants by the entirety, two parcels of real property, one a residence and the other a business property. Both properties are situated in the City of Lee’s Summit, Missouri.

*511This action arose out of a judicial sale of the business property under a judgment of partition. The residential property is not involved in this appeal. It was sold in partition on the same day and at…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Borchers v. BorchersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Burden v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Pomeroy v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. Wauchope v. McCormickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Patton v. HannaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koester v. KoesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Robert R. Wisdom Oil Co. v. GatewoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. DiLeo v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Dougherty v. McKeeverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Geigle v. GeigleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API