State v. Company
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
The state, in behalf of the public, seeks to have the defendant enjoined in its use of the outflow of Lovell pond in Wakefield, "so that it may not draw, divert, or use the same in any such manner whatsoever as to lower the surface thereof below the natural level of said pond at any and all the respective seasons of the year." Lovell pond is a "great pond," and it is alleged that the title to the pond and the soil under it is vested in the state for the benefit of the public. The defendant is a manufacturing corporation and obtains its power in part from Lovell pond. It is also alleged in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Concord Manufacturing Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
- Dolbeer v. Suncook Water-Works Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- State v. Sunapee Dam Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- State v. GilmantonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1838
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heston v. OuslerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Tilden v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1927