Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Dretke

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 18, 2004No. 03-10295PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

Jimmy Fernandez Garcia, Jr. (“Garcia”) seeks habeas relief on the grounds that the State of Texas violated the Double Jeopardy Clause when it tried him for the capital murder of Jimmy Lynn Garza (“Lynn Garza”) after a jury had already acquitted Garcia of the capital murder of David Moran (“Moran”). Garcia contends that collateral estoppel applies because the Moran jury allegedly determined a factual issue that precluded the Lynn Garza jury from finding him guilty of capital murder. We reject this argument, and in so doing reverse the district court’s grant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ward v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. David Wade v. Deb Timmerman-CooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Francisco Colorado CessaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. ShelbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API